Toolkit

Story: SCO: IBM has 'failed to comply'

Posted by: cookie (Tuesday 13 July 2004, 6:43 AM)

of course this article doesn't mention that SCO has failed to comply with two - TWO - court orders to provide its own discovery, which includes which lines, with specificity, they say were stolen. This was even supposed to take place before IBM had to turn over all their code. Of course this article doesn't bother to mention that all this evidence that SCO has repeatedly said that it had in masses is so far of the ether, and hasn't been submitted in any way to the court, to IBM, or to any of the users of either Unix (like their fake "infringement" in vegas) or Linux. Come on ZD, you can do better than being a FUD monger. How about a title like "SCO: Calling the IBM kettle black" and maybe mentioning that IBM is the only one that actually has submitted any discovery at all. They've delivered code to SCO by the truckloads, and SCO still hasn't found anything. SCO has delivered nothing to IBM, but based upon all their public stupidity, we've found everything. Don't just reprint SCO press releases, do some original research and/or thinking.