Compliance Toolkit
Story: Spyware and the law
You have just asked the $64,000 question. Unfortunately, it's extremely difficult to answer.
I would assume that the sites you refer to would not intentionally be spreading malware. However, there is no guarantee that a cracker cannot compromise a site to have it start doing this. The Web server and operating system used by a site can affect its vulnerability. See the "What's that site running" feature on www.netcraft.com to get details. The Apache Web server running on Linux or one of the various flavors of Unix (Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, SunOS, BSD-OS, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and especially OpenBSD) has been more secure than Microsoft IIS running on Windows.
Adware can slow down your system or reduce your operating stability. The article also pointed out that a cracker may be able to compromise an adware program and therefore gain access to your system. Of course, an adware producer is unlikely to call attention to security concerns in a program.
If you have access to a "clean" machine, install your firewall and Spybot on it and go to one of your "must have" Web sites. Tell Spybot and/or your firewall not to allow anything to be downloaded or installed. See if you can still access what you want to on the site. However, I can't guarantee that if your clean machine accesses the site fine without the spyware, you will be able to remove the spyware on your production machine and not have that mess up something else.
I don't know if Spybot tells you what spyware may be installed. If not, try AdAware to find out what is on your machine. Then off to Google to look up program or file names.
Sorry about all the "weasel wording," but there are simply too many relevant things that I do not know. That's the big problem with spyware - not knowing (does it cause problems, is it hostile, is it secure, can I safely remove it, etc.).
Full Talkback thread
Story: Spyware and the law
-
I use anit virus software,have a firewall and have... Anonymous -
You have just asked the $64,000 question. Unfortu... Anonymous
Back to: Spyware and the law




