Advertisement
Promo

Toolkit

Story: Firefox phishing vulnerability discovered

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Arthur B. (Thursday 6 January 2005, 8:44 PM)

  • Reply

Critical mass FUD is the typical reaction of the uninformed. If critical mass (certainly when combined with access to the source) was that important for getting succesfully attacked in large numbers then why don't we see massive and succesfull attacks on all those other Open Source products that run the Internet today in enormous numbers?

I sometimes find myself wishing that all Open Source products would stop to function for just one hour all at the same time. Perhaps then more people will start to realize how much Open Source is already part of todays life.

Another thing. Spammers, phishers, etc don't aim for a 100%, 10% or even a 1% succes rate. Since the market penetration of non-Microsoft browsers has been more then 1% for many years now. How come those poor non-Microsoft browser users haven't been slaughtered month in, month out? I mean, surely those spammers and phishers will go for the easy prey, whatever they are. And believe me, even just 1% of just 5% of the entire Internet community would be a dream come true for them.

Riddle me this. In many companies there are people using IE with very expensive security hardware and software maintained by so called experts sitting between them and the Internet and they're not amused. While at home, for those that don't use IE, there's maybe $40 of equipment between them and the Internet and they're amused. How come?

There's critical mass alright. But it's about the FUD soap box that's about to explode. Followed soon after with a critical mass of consumers and CFO's starting to ask difficult questions to there former-to-be IT salesmen, IT advisors, IT consultants and IT managers.

Basicly a whole industry used to overcharging is going to be replaced by an industry that charges fairly. And the only way to become part of that new industry is to sell something different then those products with built-in overcharging capabilities. Things are starting to get interesting.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Firefox phishing vulnerability discovered

  1. A security vulnerability..??? this is a ridicul... Pete Molina
  2. This article by Ingrid Marson and the opinion... Abe
  3. Ooooh.. I'm frightened!! I guess I'll switch... Ossama Khayat
  4. All I Have To Say Is Firefox Is The Best... Jason
  5. I agree, Pete, that the vulnerability in Fire... Graeme Wearden
  6. Firefox without a doubt, is the best and... Webx
  7. USE FIREFOX ITS MILES AND MILES AHE... robd
  8. Microsoft is waiting for one person to be caught i... The Way
  9. Big deal! This is only one problem compared to the... Anonymous
  10. If this vulnerability had been identified in IE, t... Anonymous
  11. Ouch! 'Users are smart enough to choose their... philbert
  12. Lets face it, not everyone out there is a Web... B B
  13. I think it's important to put things in conte... Anonymous
  14. The simple solution is often the best,JU... Voodoodoctor
  15. There is no reason to believe that Firefox is actu... Anonymous
  16. Critical mass FUD is the typical reaction of... Arthur B.
  17. Firefox will always be more secure than Inter... john_t
  18. It doesn't matter at all if only a couple of... Sebastián Benítez
  19. Ok, had a quick read of some of these replies... fieldyweb
  20. I have to reply to the above comment, be... Webx
  21. can't believe it! But where's the PoC? :) Anonymous
  22. Firefox is undoubtedly a better and more secu... Seb
  23. I've used Firefox since the Phoenix days. Noone e... Killian
  24. I use both Firefox and IE, and while IE is pl... Camper
  25. Ok so there is a flaw. So what? How many flaws h... Simon Buckner
  26. Nice to see an area in IT where Microsoft doesn't... Bill

Back to: Firefox phishing vulnerability discovered


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters