ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Processors Toolkit

Story: Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Casper Wilstrup (Friday 4 March 2005, 11:51 PM)

  • Reply

"64-bit computing [...] won't be a huge deal for the majority of users right away"?

Well, I'm writing this on an AMD64 laptop running pure 64 bit Linux, using a pure 64 bit version of Firefox. And I have several hundred pure 64 bit applications installed. The above may be true for the majority, but to the millions of Linux users worldwide 64 bit desktops have been a reality for a long time. I'm happy to finally see a desktop AMD clone from Intel. Competition in the 64 bit desktop/laptop scene is going to benefit us all.

And to clarify something that many people wonder about - Yes, Intel's EM64T technology is a 100% compatible clone of AMD64 (except for the 3DNow* component)

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660

  1. Why no Linux based benchmarks? 64 bit linux has a... James Essex
  2. 64 bit Linux isn't even considered in the art... davidm
  3. You know what's funny? I read these articles... Anonymous Cowheard
  4. Mostly directed at ubah Linux hardcorz: How a... Michael Jaars
  5. That's because linux suck, get a grip Anonymous
  6. "64-bit computing [...] won't be a huge deal for t... Casper Wilstrup
  7. While it's nice to see some competition in the 64-... Fredrik Tolf
  8. In the case of architectures like Ultrasparc... Tim
  9. The games benchmarks are obviously limit... Filotti
  10. What an irritatingly Windows-centric view. I need... Sean C, McCord
  11. Who cares about Windows anymore? Everyone is switc... Anonymous
  12. Linux, Linux, Linux. Do the review again! Jim
  13. not everyone is moving to linux! dont be a la... that guys a lamer
  14. How about Linux benchmarks? Windows is pretty much... Anonymous
  15. what the fuck does the following mean "although th... Anonymous
  16. STFU you stupid Linux fanboys. All you guys... Skippity McDoody
  17. To say 64-bit versions of architectures... Anonymous
  18. Hopefully you do not use intel. If you do - d... rowan
  19. what the fcuk does the following mean "although th... Anonymous
  20. Look more like an Intel Press release than a bench... Paul Blair (toadlife)
  21. You need 64-bit windows to make best use of it? Wh... michael goulish
  22. Sean, it doesn't seem to me that that is what the... Jason Archer
  23. Considering Microsoft's inability to provide... The Mitch
  24. "Intel may draw comfort from the fact that it has... Some Llama
  25. Itanium is truly 64 bits ok. read the article... Anonymous
  26. can't be 82%c. at that temp, your processor i... Anonymous
  27. I just recently bought the Intel Pentium... DeSi
  28. well to start off i think this article is sorta bi... Tyler
  29. Great review! Sorry to say that all you Linux lam... Anonymous
  30. Unless I'm missing something, neither AMD64 n... Cubase SX User
  31. I have bought the intel 660 ( 3,6GHz 64-bit) chip.... Kostis Tsiutras
  32. Windows Rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Windows Fan
  33. AMD 64-bit improved my genetic algorithm optimizat... Anonymous

Back to: Benchmarks: Intel's 64-bit Pentium 4 660


Discussions

stl_saint stl_saint

long time coming....

Thursday 21 August 2008, 3:47 AM

1 comment