Story: Microsoft's licence to kill
How idiotic. The license is available to Open Source providers, it's simply not compatible with THEIR choosen way of doing business. Additionally, the court never said MSFT couldn't charge for it. Even the socialist EU stops short of telling a company they had to give up their IP and do it for free. This whole issue is a political/national football. The reality is that anyone who wanted a rival media player could already easily download and MILLIONS do everyday. Additionally, when al the dust clears, hardly any of MSFT's competitors who were so disadvantaged by not having access to MSFT's code, will actually end up licensing it - just like in the US. Because, this isn't about access it's about trying to beat MSFT in court because they can't beat them in front of the customer.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Microsoft's licence to kill
-
I love how each new release of Microsoft products... Chay Harley -
How idiotic. The license is available to Open Sour... Anonymous -
How idiotic. ANYBODY can beat Microsoft in f... Anonymous -
I'm afraid I have to disagree with your state... John Hummel -
Assuming you're refering to my comment,... Edward Virtually -
The anonymous poster (second post above) who... Mark -
All this anti-Microsoft stuff is, in rea... Jon -
As those of us in the US have already found out, m... Edward Virtually -
As usual, a one sided deal to the extreme.
It's li... Arthur B. -
Bill touted interoperability, yet all these proble... Anonymous -
All this anti-Microsoft stuff is, in reality, the... Anonymous -
All this anti-Microsoft stuff is, in reality, the... Anonymous
Back to: Microsoft's licence to kill



