Toolkit
Story: OSX 'at risk from attack'
This is just such a load of self-serving crap ...
Just last night my fiancée told me people were telling her they couldn't access her MSN Group site because "Spyware Doctor 3.1 wouldn't let them" ... I downloaded it to my work PC and installed it (it wouldn't run in Virtual PC 7 on my home Mac).
However the part that handles "live" blocking of sites is in their persistent "OnGuard" section which you have to pay for ... not wanting to pay just to test it once I found a [k] on an Astalavista-type [k] site ... downloaded it and ran the "start" script and immediately things went haywire (not to mention it didn't [k] Spyware Doctor). In a self-referential act I ran Spyware Doctor which now said there were over 1000 infections ... the [k] had installed toolbars, HTML hijackers, you name it. Found another [k] and removed all of those ... or so I thought.
To make a long story short, I ran 3 or 4 programs including a Registry fixer and spent a couple of hours removing all of this crap (including 5 reboots) before everything was finally eradicated ... and NONE of this would ever happen on a Mac ... the "Registry" concept is so damn retarded ... TSR's that sit there and can't be killed with Task Manager ... blah blah blah and so on and so on ... the reason there's all these viruses and trojans and malware/spyware for the PC is because WINDOZE BLOWS, not because of market share - Mac OS X is, fundamentally, a UNIX under the hood so it's subject to the same issues as Linux and other Unices/derivatives - yes there are vulnerabilities but I see them every day at work and the Linux ones are so obscure and unexploitable compared to the Windoze ones it's not even comparable.
The bottom line: Symantec is screaming "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!" - would you trust the company saying that when they're the ones selling the fallout shelters?
Full Talkback thread
Story: OSX 'at risk from attack'
-
Failing of course to mention that yes- although vi... Paul Munro -
Attack does not equal vulnerability, except on Win... Olav Petri -
(1) Symantec is in the business of selling protect... Joseppi Blauinski -
This is just such a load of self-serving crap ...... Anonymous -
Total nonsense. Yes, of course as OSX grows mark... Anonymous -
When a company that sells anti-virus software anno... Ken Cox -
Symantec writes to worst software for the Mac in e... advocate -
What's Symantec's Anti-Virus for Mac going to... Ben Welsh -
They're right, but only in a trivial sense -- sinc... Laird Popkin -
What a load of FUD. Anyone with the smallest sence... Anonymous -
Unfortuantely ( and expectedly ) the virus mongers... Tor Sigurdsson -
What a load of cobblers.
A couple of years back I... Mac Guru -
Ziff Davis continues to embarrass themselves with... Anon E. Mouse -
Symantec is just concerned about their profits. T... Evan Marshall -
It is true that all operating systems are at risk... Carl Vander Bee -
They are desperate because MS is about to put them... Ryan Gray -
Has this guy ever seen a computer? what a tool! BMX BANDIT -
There are some cases where it actually is ver... Kevin Trumbull -
Windows user sees b.s. I don't buy the hype and wo... Anonymous -
In other news, if you run Windows you run the risk... Vermine
Back to: OSX 'at risk from attack'



