Security threats Toolkit
Story: Outrage at Symantec's OS X claims
Posted by: Anonymous (Tuesday 22 March 2005, 10:40 PM)
Since the Mac installed base is significantly non-zero, how come the number of active Mac OS X viruses and worms is zero? This would indicate that the problem is not directly tied to market share as Symantec claims, and may have more to do with the relatively secure nature of OS X itself.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Outrage at Symantec's OS X claims
-
This is inline with ISS reporting a vulnerability... Anonymous -
I just tested my Mac with Symantec's own onli... Wilfred Hildonen -
We have had a very involved and expensive security... Anonymous
-
When liars try to cover their asses they write art... Anonymous
-
And the Mac whiners come out of the wood work... Peter
-
THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!!
By my Super Hard Hats at a... pHHHHHHtowindozs
-
"People should not be scared, but they should make... Anonymous
-
What I really would like to know from Symatec is,... Anonymous
-
Since the Mac installed base is significantly... Anonymous -
I think that Symantec is correct. The user base fo... Jay Weiss
-
Symatec have also stated that due to the incr... Anonymous
-
No OS is 100% secure!
Obviously with a Window... Matty C.
-
There has been linkage (in the security industry)... B. Smith
-
All these sayings about the fact that MacOSX has n... Anonymous
-
The next time somebody who is in the business... David Alan Gregory
-
As the Mac becomes more popular it will become a t... Anonymous
-
well itīs quite obvious that the threats to the OS... Juan Eduardo De Magalhaes-Calvet
-
I use both Windows and Mac OS X, Mac OS X being my... Bob Kerstetter
-
These people must serously be retarded. It would t... bob
Back to: Outrage at Symantec's OS X claims
