Desktop platforms Toolkit
Story: BitKeeper: No holds barred open source infighting
Posted by: Ingrid Marson (Thursday 21 April 2005, 3:20 PM)
Thanks for your comments, Karl. I have updated the article to take into account your first comment.
Regarding your 2nd comment, I did not state that Andrew Tridgell hasn't kept up his end of the bargain.
Andrew Tridgell's point of view is stated clearly in the first paragraph of the 2nd page: "He claims he did not use BitKeeper when developing his tool and was therefore not subject to the conditions in its licence."
Full Talkback thread
Story: BitKeeper: No holds barred open source infighting
-
Actually, what the article writes is not true.
Fi... Karl Simpson -
Thanks for your comments, Karl. I have update... Ingrid Marson -
The register has an article on just how much "reve... Colin Higgs
-
Lies and misdirection from ZDNet? Why stop now.
1... John Jamieson
-
This article would be far more insightful if the a... Nick Linn
-
Ingrid,
In response to your post:
“Regarding your... Nick Linn
-
"... has split the open source community down the... Paul Fardy
-
Many people only read the first page, or even the... Wayne Schlitt
-
I struggle to find an accurate description of the... Anonymous
-
First, Linus' response to Tridge's actions was unc... Richard Steven Hack
