Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Story: Firms keep silent over child pornography

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Steve J (Thursday 12 May 2005, 11:36 AM)

  • Reply

The problem is, every IT administrator knows that as soon as an allegation of kiddie porn is made to the police, the police will remove for evidence every item of hardware that could have been involved. That means computers, servers, routers, firewalls, you name it. Seems over the top, but they're not going to risk not getting a conviction through lack of evidence. It could also reveal accomplices and contacts, however, I reckon this is the real reason why a network admin wouldn't report it. Who wants to be responsible for such a massive uproar?

On the other hand, a proper policy for these things generally comes down from on high, so it's a director that responsible for setting out the policy of reporting it to the police. All the IT admin is doing is following orders.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Sentry Posts Blog

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters