Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: Row over report praising Windows patching
Posted by: Arthur B. (Saturday 21 May 2005, 10:23 PM)
Cost of roll-back?
Ever had to roll-back a highly critical should-have-been-installed-yesterday Microsoft patch because some important application choked on it?
If you did and you truly know what really makes organisations tick at what cost then you understand how realistic pro-Microsoft reports really are.
What looks good on paper in the eyes of stuck-behind-a-desk decision makers hardly ever survives the reality of the work floor where things actually happen and can't hide behind paper "facts".
It really is time to listen more to the people who have solid working experience with more then just one platform.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Row over report praising Windows patching
-
When will Microsoft realise that these self-funded... Anonymous -
Picking a single daisy in a field full of bra... Scott Marlowe -
I was reading this thread when I was sen... Anonymous -
The pains of rebooting after a patch are the bigge... David Wright
-
Compared to what disto of Linux. Mac do this too -... Anonymous
-
Microsoft must be getting desperate. So far open s... Steve J
-
My Linux boxes and server run 24/7. Updated r... Anonymous
-
The "fact" could be different from another point o... Lupa
-
Cost of roll-back?
Ever had to roll-back a highly... Arthur B. -
I believe that Patching a windows system is far mo... Aaron Hodgson
