Desktop platforms Toolkit 
Story:
Posted by: Anonymous (Thursday 2 June 2005, 8:45 AM)
Seems to me that if an infringing company claims the Free Software Foundation is the licencor then they're screwed. Since the FSF has no legal right to grant a license for something they don't own the copyright to, the argument would indicate that the license is void. In which case copyright law kicks in and almost any usage becomes infringement.
Full Talkback thread
-
This is obvious bunk.. dreamt up by those who wish... bobby -
This "lawyer" is a blithering idiot. The GPL FAQ... steve burnap
-
Stupid, stupid article. There is NO DOUBT WH... David F. Skoll -
I heartily agree. The author should have read... Jürgen Strobel
-
Seems to me that if an infringing company claims t... Anonymous -
It seems to me that it doesn't matter who owns the... Anonymous
-
The instructions to insert a copyright notice... Anonymous
-
if no copyright is presant save gpl or even exclud... if u cant patent math
