Intellectual property Toolkit
Story: Microsoft frowned at for smiley patent
Posted by: Lonnie E. Holder (Thursday 28 July 2005, 3:08 PM)
A couple of points regarding the article posted 22 Jul 2005 regarding
Microsoft patent application 20050156873 for "Custom Emoticons."
1. The phrase "The US Patent Office has not yet made a decision on whether
to accept the patent application" is misleading. The USPTO has "accepted"
the patent application into the patent process. The USPTO normally does
not decide whether to "accept" an application. The USPTO DOES decide
whether the application will be allowed to issue as a patent, and this
application is currently in that process.
2. 37 CFR 1.99 (CFR = Code of Federal Regulations) provides a third party
the opportunity to submit patents and publications pertinent to a published
patent applications if the submission is made within two months of
publication of the patent application. The submission must be in English,
submission of a $180 fee (subject to change), a copy of the patent or
publication, notification to the applicant, and no explanation of the
submitted materials.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Microsoft frowned at for smiley patent
-
That language parsing patent's only technical aspe... Trevor Simms -
Perhaps Microsoft should apply for copyright... Dave Stover -
Microsoft did think the internet would grow to wha... robobright
-
This is the kind of shit I want to keep out of Eur... Samuel,UK
-
Well said, Samuel,UK
wasn't there somthing ab... JhonSmith
-
Microsoft is dead. Software Patents are dead. The... Still Balates
-
Screw Microsoft. Actions like these are why the te... Joey A.
-
I wondered how this differed from what a lot of op... Richard
-
The item you link to is a patent application, not... Anonymous
-
What's next? Microsoft attempts to patent fonts an... Last Angelman
-
that sort of shit gives me a microsofton! kapster
-
I think Microsoft is lacking talent, thats why the... Anonymous
-
A true technical innovation (not)
At first I thoug... Anonymous
-
PRIOR ART -- what Microsoft is patenting has alrea... Randolf Richardson
-
If microsolf truly does patent this, I hope that a... Anonymous
-
... for me just another very good reason to defina... Lothar Velling
-
Dont the patents office have some form of prosecut... Tony
-
Is it April 1 ? John Sims
-
Huh, say what? If a technique has been used "widel... Michiel NL
-
Hey, I think I'll just patent the alphabet and mak... Anonymous
-
Of course as usual the article writer and anti-M$... Jason M. Knight
-
The primary claim for the patent application... Ingrid Marson
-
The first claim must be read as a whole.... Tom Olszewski -
The problem is the US patent laws. They are simply... Beast
-
A couple of points regarding the article post... Lonnie E. Holder -
Another commentor stated that pharmaceutical... Lonnie E. Holder
-
I agree with Microsoft !!!! Apple sucks Anonymous
-
Microsoft can patent smilies? Oh, I forgot. Micros... Kinney
-
I think it's crazy, trying to own everything. Inte... Anonymous
-
so patent for using FONTS will be next...
after al... Dustie
-
Wtf, those guys are gonna make us change the names... Adam
-
This has been up for consideration for a year and... Nik
-
Gee. I can include whatever image in whatever mes... Arthur B.
-
hahahahahahahhahahahahaahahaha omg...
this will in... d34d
-
One of my forefathers invented the kiss and fart.... Ken Davies
-
SH**! I just realised that Microsoft may be able t... Ken Davies
-
Can't blame them for doing something that the gove... Peter Ritchie
-
It seems that people are continuing to miss t... Lonnie E. Holder
-
Microsoft,
please please don't ty this.
Yahoo use... Anonymous
-
Well back in 1968 I did create a 'Smiley Face' bad... Chris Dunne
