Post a comment

Story: 'Linux' trademark doesn't matter, says Stallman

"Free software means you're free to run it, study it, change it, redistribute it, and distribute modified versions — the way cooks do with recipes. What names you're allowed to call a program is a side issue."

If the above quote is accurate and not taken out of context (both of which are suspect) then I think that RMS is being a tad hypocritical and inconsistent -- traits that have heretofore been conspicuously absent in his remarks.

First, the four freedoms are the principles and trademarking, linences, etc. are merely the tools used to implement those freedoms. So, of course, the principles are "more important" than the tools. In fact, they are not even comparable.

Secondly, the GNU Foundation uses existing intellectual property law to protect its products -- notably the GPL. Making derogatory remarks about the Linux community doing the same thing is not quite kosher.

Finally, as for names being a side issue, try using the term "Linux" simpliciter in front of RMS. You'll very quickly get "corrected". I have even read -- though have no means of substantiating -- that RMS will not give interviews nor make appearances unless the OS is always referred to as "GNU/Linux".

Come now, RMS, are you the pot calling the kettle black?

Full Talkback thread