Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: Legal worries led Massachusetts to open standards
Posted by: David Ross (Tuesday 6 September 2005, 10:37 PM)
What a bunch of bull! Not supporting the OpenDocument format because of backward compatability?? If they were really concerned about compatibility, they could warn the user that there would be a format loss (which they do for any other export they already have), then do it anyway.
The only reason to not support it is monopolistic business practices. They don't really think anybody buys this crap, do they?
Full Talkback thread
Story: Legal worries led Massachusetts to open standards
-
Ofcourse Microsoft will have to do an all out assa... Arthur B. -
Let's hope they that Mass. doesn't have a lot... Anonymous -
The MS license is not online. I've looked and loo... Anonymous
-
Yates is incorrect. OpenDocument is supported by... Anonymous
-
In fact, many office packages support the for... a.c.
-
Who do Microsoft think they are? If Pepsi went aro... Richard
-
Well I think that MS products are much better... Anonymous
-
It doesn't amaze me that Microsoft will... Anonymous -
For every popular piece of proprietary s... Anonymous
-
"Well I think that MS products are much... Segovia
-
Re: "If Pepsi went around threatening people... Chris Nicolson
-
Patent problems? OK Mr. Ballmer, how man... Rob -
Re Re: "If Pepsi went around threatening... Richard
-
I'm sick of Microsoft whining that... Rodd Clarkson
-
/*
Microsoft will not support OpenDocument in its... Yagotta B. Kidding
-
(a) Microsoft's MSXML format won't open in Of... Anonymous
-
Microsoft made the decision themselves. They decid... David Finch
-
Where was Microsoft's concern for backward compati... Paul Robinson
-
What I find funny, is that OOo 2.0 beta 2 sup... Mitch 74
-
LIES AND FUD from Yates:
(1) As "a.c." points out,... Rick Stockton
-
What a bunch of bull! Not supporting the OpenDocu... David Ross -
The comments from Microsoft don't hold water.
In w... Luke Kendall
