Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: Legal worries led Massachusetts to open standards
Posted by: Anonymous (Tuesday 6 September 2005, 2:35 PM)
(a) Microsoft's MSXML format won't open in Office 2000; forced upgrade path?
(b) Microsoft is (was?) a member of the OpenDocument committee; are they saying they deliberately created a sub-standard spec? Or that they're too good to support the spec they helped write?
For Microsoft, it's all about lock-in; points to Mass. for calling their bluff.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Legal worries led Massachusetts to open standards
-
Ofcourse Microsoft will have to do an all out assa... Arthur B. -
Let's hope they that Mass. doesn't have a lot... Anonymous -
The MS license is not online. I've looked and loo... Anonymous
-
Yates is incorrect. OpenDocument is supported by... Anonymous
-
In fact, many office packages support the for... a.c.
-
Who do Microsoft think they are? If Pepsi went aro... Richard
-
Well I think that MS products are much better... Anonymous
-
It doesn't amaze me that Microsoft will... Anonymous -
For every popular piece of proprietary s... Anonymous
-
"Well I think that MS products are much... Segovia
-
Re: "If Pepsi went around threatening people... Chris Nicolson
-
Patent problems? OK Mr. Ballmer, how man... Rob -
Re Re: "If Pepsi went around threatening... Richard
-
I'm sick of Microsoft whining that... Rodd Clarkson
-
/*
Microsoft will not support OpenDocument in its... Yagotta B. Kidding
-
(a) Microsoft's MSXML format won't open in Of... Anonymous -
Microsoft made the decision themselves. They decid... David Finch
-
Where was Microsoft's concern for backward compati... Paul Robinson
-
What I find funny, is that OOo 2.0 beta 2 sup... Mitch 74
-
LIES AND FUD from Yates:
(1) As "a.c." points out,... Rick Stockton
-
What a bunch of bull! Not supporting the OpenDocu... David Ross
-
The comments from Microsoft don't hold water.
In w... Luke Kendall
