ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Story: Mozilla hits back at browser security claim

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Anonymous (Wednesday 2 November 2005, 4:23 PM)

  • Reply

What the hell is this symantec 'expert' talking about to another 'expert' journalist????

Accept it, Symentec and Miki$oft - Mozilla is more secure simply by virtue of not running Active X. Even in IE if you disable active X, it still pops up annoying dialogs warning you that it's disabled. Stupid idiot microblow$ 'engineers' thought it would be helpful. Morons - It's not helpful, it's idiotic. Also, what about stupid BHO (browser helper objects), etc, etc that makes IE a virus factory???? What pisses me off most about IE is that I can get infected by just browsing a site and not even know about it. It happened to me several times. I stopped using IE as my main browser. I use Mozilla. yes, it's slower, I don't care. It won't screw me like IE and I don't require multi-gigabyte patchset hotfixes from micro-ooze via 'automatic' updates.

Like the rest of Micro$oft's OS, IE is shit. It has always been shit and will always be shit. I am forced to use Microsoft's OSes every day because the applications that I need do not run under Unix. If that ever changes, Bill Gates will get a hot lava enema from the market place. Have a nice day, you all, omega geeks.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Mozilla hits back at browser security claim

  1. Even if the two browsers had equally insecure code... Rich Steiner
  2. Let's not lose perspective here people. Even if Fi... Call Me Yo Daddy
  3. Im fine with Both Internet Explorer and Fire... Albert B
  4. What is this REALLY telling us? It tells us that... Thomas Corriher
  5. Remember: * Mozilla's core theme is Internet {brow... Cade Foster
  6. To Ollie Whitehouse: You have given us the answer... Arthur B.
  7. Symantec and Microsoft cannot be trusted. Muc... Michael Jennings
  8. What is this nonsense being spouted by a supp... Mike Read
  9. When you think about it, Symantec's entire busines... Anonymous
  10. You guys bashing Symantec about this are all... Anonymous
  11. We've heard this all before. They're trying t... Anonymous
  12. perhaps people should be fair when reporting vulne... Anonymous
  13. Obviously symantec has to point problems on Mozill... Ramprasad B
  14. Replying to Thomas Corriher above: Quote: " .... Joe Jones
  15. Opera8 has great security (see secunia.com) and si... Anonymous
  16. Last time I checked Firefox didn't automatically u... Anonymous
  17. Last time I checked Firefox didn't automatica... oldator
  18. Actually, Firefox DOES automatically update i... Omega Shenron
  19. As anyone thought that maybe Symantec's report is... Greg Pfister
  20. Is it any wonder many technologists view tech jour... Kevin Theobald
  21. firefox may fail to update itself, and won't give... Anonymous
  22. Security by Obscurity has been found to be frail.... Jerry Mcguire
  23. So they(mozilla) do agree that their browser are N... Anonymous
  24. What the hell is this symantec 'expert' talking ab... Anonymous
  25. The spammers with their popups are getting cl... Flash Sucks

Back to: Mozilla hits back at browser security claim