Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: No Office on Linux 'at this time'
Who the shaq cares?
I think that Linux, software-wise, is actually in a pretty happy position.
Two reasons:
*We have enough users and developers that we have essentially every program that Linux users use, programs that are up to date and plenty of drivers.
*We DON'T have enough users that marketing firms try to hit us up with spyware.
I'm pretty content with that.
Besides, Microsoft's software probably wouldn't be that good a thing to have on Linux. Microsoft doesn't just make software with holes, they make software with revolving doors that simply ~let~ malicious spyware simply waltz right in without even having to hack or break any laws.
When they say 'no Office for Linux', I equate it to God looking out for us. (Maybe He's tired of computer crashes too.)
Full Talkback thread
Story: No Office on Linux 'at this time'
-
As someone said on LinuxToday: "Can we have that... David F. Skoll -
The REAL question is : WHY do we NEED Office? Off... Bobcat -
Fine with me: For the desperate, an extra $40 for... rickst29 -
MS can't afford to put Office on Linux and it... Shane Sturrock -
Back in the early days M$ had an R&D div... oldator -
Who the shaq cares?
I think that Linux, software-w... Joe "Frapazoid" Cooper -
Microsoft will experience a slow but verry sure su... Anonymous -
Reality calling geek world
Microsoft OS and o... Jon -
Carlos -
Reality...
The Microsoft market share will become... Arthur B. -
It's clear that McGrath doesn't share the same vis... Edward Gillespie
Back to: No Office on Linux 'at this time'




