Security threats Toolkit
Story: Tsunami appeal site 'hacker' found guilty
Posted by: Anonymous (Friday 7 October 2005, 10:23 PM)
He claims he was scared that the site was a phishing
scam. Breaking in is not a means of making that determination. What, if you cannot break in the site is legit,
or is it legit if you CAN break in.
He lied to the police about what he was doing. That is evidence of a guilty mind. As I recall, that's called "mens rea". If he thought he himself was guilty, why shouldn't a judge?
Full Talkback thread
Story: Tsunami appeal site 'hacker' found guilty
-
Wow. Getting responses from ports on a network com... richard -
if there is a building and the front door is... spacelab10000 -
No, it's like walking around trying everyone'... Anonymous
-
"The only reason he did this is because he thought... Anonymous
-
The first person talks about connecting on co... Evil Wizard
-
As a programmer (not just another web surfer) I wo... Anonymous
-
I'm sorry if we offended the programmer -- wh... Matt Loney
-
He claims he was scared that the site was a phishi... Anonymous -
If you'd like to tell the judge what you think of... Anonymous
-
Go to any security professional and they shou... Anonymous
-
Read the UK law, did he attempt to penet... Anonymous -
I understand that what he did broke... Anonymous
-
Going totally against the flow... John Airey
-
Ok first off the analogy that... Evil Wizard
-
Evil Wizard, what you say is t... John Airey
-
John I dont believe in this ca... Evil Wizard
-
Evil Wizard, if you can't beli... John Airey
-
There is an obvious breach of the Computer Misuse... Alex Pinheiro
-
Well if this is now a crime, then come get me righ... Anonymous
