Security threats Toolkit
Story: Experts clash over merits of anti-spam authentication
SPF is designed to stop email forgery. It is not designed to tell you if any given email is spam or not. While a lot of spam uses forged email addresses, and thus SPF failures are often a good indicator of spam, forged email is often undesirable, even if it is not explictly spam.
Fitzgerald says that SPF is "breakable" by having bot nets no longer forge email addresses is kind of silly. The world would be a much better place if all spammers and phishers did exactly what Fitzgerald suggests. It would mean a large reduction in the amount of bounced spam going to the wrong person and having people blame you just because your email address was forged.
I am sad that both Outblaze and Earthlink have removed their support of SPF. On the other hand, other major ISPs such as Roadrunner, have added support for SPF during that same time period. While it would be nice if there was a steady increase in SPF support, I am not surprised that various organizations have been adding and deleting SPF records, as they have since the beginning.
SPF allows you to apply reputations to incoming email, so that known spamming domains can be blocked, and known good domains can be let through, even if the email uses a few spammy keywords. Many spammers are stupid and will publish SPF records even if it hurts them. Even more marketing departments think what they are doing isn't spamming, and so they publish SPF records too.
I've never figured out why folks like CiperTrust are so worried when lots of email that is spam shows up with valid SPF records. This, again, is a good thing. It lets us block them easier.
I don't believe any single system will stop spam. I think that DNSBLs, bayesian analysis, SPF, DKIM, DCC/Razor, detection of deceptive HTML, legal pursuit, ISPs kicking off spammers, etc. all can play an important part of reducing spam. Spam, like other forms of theft, will never go away, but to stop theft we don't *just* depend on the police. We also have locks on our doors, we have neighborhood watches, we keep doors well lit, etc.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Experts clash over merits of anti-spam authentication
-
Hi
I manage the antispam ops at Outblaze, and we'r... Suresh Ramasubramanian -
SPF is designed to stop email forgery. It is... Wayne Schlitt -
SPF was merely intended as an anti-forgery solutio... Neil Murray -
I would be very happy to have viruses stop forging... Anonymous -
Mail authentication is wishful thinking because it... Arthur B.
Back to: Experts clash over merits of anti-spam authentication








