Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Story: Experts clash over merits of anti-spam authentication

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Arthur B. (Wednesday 12 October 2005, 1:33 AM)

  • Reply

Mail authentication is wishful thinking because its symptom fighting. So speaking of all the benefits achieved once mail authentication is achieved are simply bogus.

There are existing tools out there that could significantly cut into spam. Without overhauling currently established designs. Without opening up potentially new holes. Without putting additional requirements on currently installed software. So why not use that first before overhauling the lot? Or put in other words. Suppose mail authentication doesn't work out quite as expected. How easy would it be to rip it out again?

Why is it that when something doesn't work out as expected it first gets ignored for years. To then be followed by a cry for updates and upgrades? Why not first see if the objective can be reached with existing means?

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Sentry Posts Blog

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments

Symantec website breached

Security company Symantec has said that one of its websites was successfully breached. Romanian security researcher 'Unu' posted details of the breach in a blog post on Monday. Unu... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters