Security threats Toolkit
Story: Tsunami 'hacker' is innocent, say readers
Posted by: Anonymous (Tuesday 11 October 2005, 1:38 PM)
How ludicrous that an act as simple as trying an amended url can result in a fine and loss of employment. So now we must check and double check when entering a URL in case we set of an IDS alarm with our mis-spelling.
This is a stupid ruling, flies in the face of public opion and just makes no sense at all.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Tsunami 'hacker' is innocent, say readers
-
What happens if someone put that URL up as a link... Anonymous -
I often alter URLs to try to navigate badly design... Anonymous
-
So how do you check if a website is genuine o... Alan -
The situation has arisen due to the wordings of th... Praveen Dalal
-
It is unclear to me and, no doubt, most other... Noh W Jose
-
Having read this, it is even more Bolleux than I t... Steve B
-
How ludicrous that an act as simple as trying... Anonymous -
If, as reported he tried the ol' /../../... Richard Pettigrew -
does that mean people think i can test their house... danny carr
-
Was this hacking or just 'acking? If you go for a... Writtroam
-
The ruling is unfair and I will go with the majori... Vinod Patel
-
Posting a website is an invitation to enter. It i... Anonymous
-
I not a security speaclist, or judge. However you... Anonymous
-
This is like a house breaker accidentally set... Fujikid
