Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit

Story: GNOME to fish in embedded Linux pond

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Anonymous (Tuesday 11 October 2005, 3:37 PM)

  • Reply

> The cost is trivial for a larger outfit of course, but it is
> not cheap for a small shop (1-5 developers or so).

You've never been in a small development shop then. They spend thousand on development tools, and you might as well ask for free furniture, heating, lighting and premises for all your employees.

> The perceived advantages to Qt over GTK is rather
> overstated. We have looked into both and the
> difference in "productivity" is just about negliglible.

You haven't looked hard enough. Sad to say, but only a die-hard GTK fan makes that kind of comment. GTK isn't even a complete development framework either, so I don't know how you can make that comparison.

> One toolkit has advantages in one area, the other
> in another. There is no clear-cut winner,
> development wise, but depends on your
> particular needs and priorities.

Nope, Qt blows it out of the water. Any developer can see that. End.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Video icon

Video

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters