Story: Developers 'should be accountable' for security holes
Developers don't make the decisions as to what is put/not put into a product.Seems like a way for the decision makers/management to shift responsibilty from their decision and blame the powerless developer.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Developers 'should be accountable' for security holes
-
If you are writing programs for a specific OS then... oldator -
Howard Schmidt sounds like yet another egghea... Bruce Allen -
Schmidt seems to be suggesting that the... jim bob -
Some of you guys are amazing.
It's... Big Al -
Hmmm.. certainly got everyone... Stevie -
BUNK! Absolute bunk! Unless Schmidt acknowledges... Floyd May -
Brilliant...This is the fastest way I can thi... Stan Fisher -
This is nonsense. The company should be liable for... Anonymous -
Is an auto designer personnally liable for a... Glenn Branch -
Dammit!
I'm so fscking SICK of these people who tr... Anonymous -
agree with software application security - th... Bill Dobson -
Bill - Let me guess... the additional pr... Coleman -
You can hold developers responsible... Rob Fielding -
Customers want developers to write software that d... Anonymous -
In most cases, the developer does not own the... Anonymous -
Developers don't make the decisions as to what is... Anonymous -
As a software developer my manager gives me a... Tom Jones -
I am sure he writes code every day!! Here is anoth... Anonymous -
This won't work for several reasons:
** Since most... Anonymous -
Software is extremely complex and will always be c... Jose Sandoval -
Consumers should be (and ultimately are, through l... Nathan Tenney -
If we take this to its logical conclusion we have... Anonymous -
Well this will certainly have the effect of gettin... Lawrence Foard -
CMM doesn't represent how good your developers are... Anonymous -
WHAT CONSTITUTES A SECURITY HOLE? WHAT ABOUT MISU... Dave Monk -
I'd love the time to make all my code completely s... Anonymous -
There are huge problems with this idea:
a) develop... Ian Woollard -
Training is just one of the variables in this equa... Anonymous -
This is a clearly a bureaucrat tooting his own hor... Coleman -
Kiss my donkey Mr. Schmidt!! I wouldn't accept suc... Anonymous -
Not to speak lowly of a mans education, but Mr. Sc... Anonymous -
Has this person ever worked in a 'real world' prog... Anonymous -
Mr. Schmidt is gone senile
Software products will... aspen -
Should a developer be held accountable for a secur... Anonymous -
Here's why Schmidt is an idiot.
Individual develop... John Boe -
This is pure insanity and a perfect example of a p... Anonymous -
Mr. Howard Schmidt has no clue about software deve... Anonymous -
Let me guess... BUSH White House advisor.
The arti... John Boe -
another idiot suit who got his job through cr... Anonymous -
Sounds like a great idea to me... What about other... Anonymous -
Bad idea. Here's why:
1) Developers generally tak... Joe Cochran -
If this guys is an "expert" I'm a pink flying elep... Brendan -
Mr Espiner,
Thank you for publishing this article... Anonymous -
I love this idea!
You see, I own and manage a soft... Anonymous -
just as soon as ass-hat politicians and televangel... who cares -
If Developers should be liable for security holes... Anonymous -
It's freaking' time... the difference between free... T2k -
I love the idea. But if I wonder if any employer... Twan -
If the developer is legally liable for his own cod... Bill Hauck -
This is a standard business tatic...the compa... Charles H Martin, PhD -
Poor Howard embarasses himself with this one. Anonymous -
CEO's should be liable for company failures. The... Bernard Deuce -
Howard Schmidt obviously has no understanding of h... Anonymous -
Step up to plate Developers - don't just hide... Ben Williams -
Great idea if ....
- You want to ensure that all s... Anonymous -
Schmidt almost certainly doesn't know what he's ta... Rex Page -
So going by Mr. Schmidt's logic, if tomorrow there... Rajesh Sharma -
Seeing that lawyers have squeezed every drop of li... Anonymous -
Ex-White House huh? Let me guess -- Bush crony?... Anonymous -
Anyone who works in software security (and has a c... Anonymous -
As a professional software engineer, I strongly di... Andrew Rondeau -
He is a cowboy.
Security is moving target dumber.... Anonymous -
Mr. Schmidt is obviously a fool. But if he is will... Sam -
There is a total disconnect with reality!
Quality... Franz -
Howard Schmidt is so naive about the subject of so... Rob C -
Somebody has to stand up and say these things... Rob Lewis -
I agree that software companies should try to make... Anonymous -
How about to include any type of bug into company'... marius herghelegiu -
The problem is that customers and employers don't... Anonymous -
Mr. Schmidth seems to have found a way to quickly... Arthur B. -
So, according to his theory, if someone hot-wires... Anonymous -
Schmidt is unskiled and unaware of it. His inflate... Kathleen Fasanella -
So, I assume he also wants to hold assembly line w... Anonymous -
Another management guy pushing responsibility down... Anonymous -
Does he believe that developers have the ultimate... Anonymous -
As much as I'd like to be accountable, the level o... Anonymous -
[rant type="trolling back at the article's antagon... Anonymous
Back to: Developers 'should be accountable' for security holes

