ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

Story: Gartner: Ignore Vista until 2008

  • Previous comment

Posted by: David Goodwin (Sunday 13 November 2005, 1:06 AM)

  • Reply

Vista is indeed based on WindowsNT Server 5.2. The only version of WindowsNT that was ever written from scratch was 3.1, all the others add nothing more than a few security patches and new "features". WindowsNT 4.0 - 5.2 all share the same kernel - the differences are in its user interface (explorer), applications (MMC, WMP), drives (filesystem, network, etc), and networking protocols (Active Directory).

Why should Microsoft spend huge ammounts of money and time re-writing Windows when they can just make a few minor modifications and pass it off as a new product? Think of all the money they make selling the same product over and over to the same people when half of the new "features" should have been present in security patches years before.

Think about it, what are the differences between NT4 and NT5? MMC, WMP, PnP drivers, better version of Explorer. what about NT5 and 5.1? slower interface, a few new games, and a bad attempt at a firewall. None of these things are worth spending a few hundred $$ upgrading. As for the windows series, what differences are there between 95 and 98? aside from Active Desktop (usless but available with IE4 for win95).

In conclusion, Why should Windows Vista realy be any different from XP? As long as they change the logo, add some new useless "features" that no one uses, and decrease its performance (so it looks like the new "features" actualy do somthing), people will buy it thinking they are "upgrading". At any rate, most of the new "features" one might actualy use in Vista are already available for XP at no cost.

OR, dump windows all to gether and be rid of its security, stability, and performance problems.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: Gartner: Ignore Vista until 2008

  1. Ignore Vista completly. Thats my advice. Vista req... Magnus Grander
  2. Couldn't agree more. Vista is yet another NT... Bob Robertson
  3. Yeah, because in all offices, the software th... Kurt Christ
  4. Any half trained office monkey can be tr... spk037
  5. "Don't give me any arguments about how f... Elisabeth Friis
  6. Vista is a good work. kholk
  7. Vista Anonymous
  8. From those who have watched Windows users twist in... Mac User - X-Windows Drone
  9. I think that Vista will be to XP what ME was... Dilbert
  10. abandon one tyrannical company for another, v... bah
  11. One thing is for sure. Vista will look a lot prett... gorbel
  12. Ignorance is bliss Windows Fan Boy! I'm sitti... Ben Der
  13. "Your stuck sucking on viruses, worms, s... Anonymous
  14. "One thing is for sure. Vista will look a lot... Don B
  15. Windows does not support most of the hardware... Mirza Borogovac
  16. have you ever try to install Windows xp... towsonu2003
  17. Yes I am always amazed when reinsta... Anonymous
  18. "Install XP from sratch...Everytime... Anonymous
  19. Here's what's funny. Win NT was originally design... tm2b
  20. Vista isn't simply a super-patched version of... Joe S.
  21. Has Gartner used the beta for VIsta? the... Chris Ashtear
  22. Joe S. -- you DO realize that NONE of t... PatriotB
  23. Dump Windows ?? kidding right ? umair
  24. I heard about Vista requiring a mon... sb
  25. What inspired the new GUI for... Anonymous
  26. The HDMI requirement, AFAIK, i... David Wright
  27. DRM Monitor?? huh? kholk
  28. On the other hand Dave Cutler wanted a comman... Drew
  29. Make that 2010. Given Vista 1,2 and 3. Excluding t... Arthur B.
  30. Get SUSE instead of "upgrading" to Vista. Anonymous
  31. Patriot: You DO realize that Vista is built from s... Harijs G.
  32. Harijs G. - show us ONE piece of evidence tha... PatriotB
  33. The only OS built from scratch from MS i... Dilbert
  34. Vista is indeed based on WindowsNT Server 5.2. The... David Goodwin
  35. I've read all your posts with great interest.... Anonymous
  36. No programmer should ever be let near th... Jon
  37. You guys are barking at the wrong tree. Gartner is... C-Fu
  38. People that want to wait for Vista because of some... Arthur B.
  39. Isn't the next version of Mac OS going to be... Caped Crusader
  40. There is only one reason to use Linux: F... Anonymous
  41. Freedom to pick up and SDK and try... Anonymous
  42. couldn't agree more... Heck I tell clients this A... William Wheeler

Back to: Gartner: Ignore Vista until 2008

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.