Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit

Story: Microsoft rejects IBM strategy and open source 'dorks'

  • Previous comment

Posted by: poppe (Wednesday 16 November 2005, 6:19 PM)

  • Reply

Yes! there can be no comparison with the live versions of office and Windows. I mean Linux doesn't have the security holes that Windows does due to it's architecture. Being that you don't have to download a thousand and one service packs just to have a secure and stable OS. Furthermore Open office doen't have the security holes that office does either.

So here's a question that all who are pondering trying out the MS live apps... If the packaged stuff you've used in the past has a ton of security holes in it. Then how many more will you get with Microsoft applications that require an Internet connection in order to function? Also, remember that Microsoft tried bundling various applications together into Windows before, and ended up with a massive bloatware that crashes all the time, and had extra security holes in it.

Try a flavor of UNIX for a change folks. I guarantee that you'll love it, and never want to turn back!

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread


Video icon

Video

Microsoft Windows 7 Special Report Special Report

How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

Comment Many businesses have given Vista a wide berth; Microsoft must focus on five areas to make sure Windows 7 doesn't suffer the same fate, argues TechRepublic's Jason Hiner

More Special Reports

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters