Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit

Story: Open source renders patching a problem

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Bill DuPree (Friday 18 November 2005, 4:11 AM)

  • Reply

States the bleeding obvious. An admin should always know what's running on their servers regardless of whether is Windows, Linux, BSD, etc.

What it doesn't state is that all major Linux distributions have automated patching that is the equal to, if not superior to, Microsoft's update methodology. Instead the implication is that FOSS offerings are somehow a big risk because they are unpatched.

An unpatched and insecure server OS in either the Windows or Linux case results solely from poor administration.

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Sentry Posts Blog

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments

Symantec website breached

Security company Symantec has said that one of its websites was successfully breached. Romanian security researcher 'Unu' posted details of the breach in a blog post on Monday. Unu... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters