Story: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
Posted by: Anonymous (Thursday 5 January 2006, 10:03 PM)
Can't reporters do MATH???? Geez, they're supposed to be skeptical and question everything.
The same vulnerability is being counted multiple times. Plus, there's no analysis of how many of these vulnerabilities remain unpatched. As a result, this list is beyond meaningless - it's a pretty set of numbers, Sir Billy can give it a nice frame and stick it up on his wall as decoration.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
-
These statistics mean nothing - one of the biggest... Matt Webber -
If you read that then read this too.
http://t... Anonymous -
Can't reporters do MATH???? Geez, they're su... Anonymous -
What matters isn't the amount of vulnera... Anonymous -
So ALL UNIX like operating systems combined had ab... Walt Reed
-
So you count Mandriva, Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Ge... Oldator
-
I don't know why any self-respecting journali... Clay Garland
-
OS, Web Server and Hosting History for www.us-cert... Philip
-
What the article fails to mention that anytime new... Anonymous
Back to: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
