Security threats Toolkit
Story: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
Posted by: Oldator (Friday 6 January 2006, 3:22 PM)
So you count Mandriva, Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo,& Linspire separately. Soumds like more M$
FUD. Why not count windows 3.0, 3.1, 95, 98, 98SE,
ETC. as there are people still using these. Unpatched
vulnerabilities for the older OS's would be too many
to count.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
-
These statistics mean nothing - one of the biggest... Matt Webber -
If you read that then read this too.
http://t... Anonymous -
Can't reporters do MATH???? Geez, they're su... Anonymous
-
What matters isn't the amount of vulnera... Anonymous -
So ALL UNIX like operating systems combined had ab... Walt Reed
-
So you count Mandriva, Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, Ge... Oldator -
I don't know why any self-respecting journali... Clay Garland
-
OS, Web Server and Hosting History for www.us-cert... Philip
-
What the article fails to mention that anytime new... Anonymous
Back to: Linux and Unix 'had more vulnerabilities than Windows'
