Security threats Toolkit
Story: Spam campaigners reject email payment plan
Posted by: Phoenix (Monday 13 February 2006, 11:06 PM)
Does anyone really think that this is not just a glitzed up opportunity for corporates to pass yet another cost onto the consumer?
On the surface it may seem that it is limited to companies spamming, however it will not be long before the costs are passed on and we find ourselves paying for yet another service.. Maybe I am too cynical, however it is seen all too often in modern times
Full Talkback thread
Story: Spam campaigners reject email payment plan
-
There is one way to tell the Government what it is... Larry J. Linder -
there should be no charge for e mail since this is... hasmukh
-
No, no, no. Email should stay free. This is just... Anonymous
-
Who couldn't see this coming years ago?? AOL,MSN,E... Anonymous
-
Let's all open e-mail accounts with crazy nam... Anonymous -
It sounds as if AOL are selling a license to SPAM.... Anonymous
-
I don't know the specifics of the AOL plan, but I'... JC
-
err. arn't these comments spam samuel_uk
-
Reckon paid for consumer email may well be se... Jon
-
How can they guarantee that the mail wil... David Wright -
Once again we see someone slighting... Andrew Meredith
-
As was quoted before 'At the m... Jon -
If the first one hundred messa... Charles Weber
-
Does anyone really think that... Phoenix -
I don't quiet get the deal here. A... AndyH
-
I do not agree to this proposal as it is not a nec... Chris Goodman
