Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Story: UK firms lagging on.eu

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Gerrard Bridglal (Wednesday 8 March 2006, 11:11 PM)

  • Reply

We are a UK company and recently applied for an .eu name to protect our branding during the sunrise period for registered trademarks.

Today I was informed that our application had been rejected.

We provided our registered trademark details as requested.

We also are the registered domain holders of the .com, .co.uk, .tv, .org, .info, .biz and .net of the same domain name.

We are now awaiting the result of emails sent to PWC the validation agent and Eurid as well as our registrars to see if there is a big con going on with .eu registrations - no wonder there is a lack of interest - especially when you find out the costs involved for ADR 1000,s of Euros !!

Regard Gerrard Bridglal

Dear Sirs,

I recently applied for a .eu domain name during the sunrise period and provided the necessary documentation to PWC.

The name applied for was wotson.eu.

Being the registered trademark holder of 'wotson', registered at the UK Patent Office and also the registered domain holder of wotson.com, wotson.co.uk, wotson.net, wotson.info, wotson.biz, wotson.org, and wotson.tv there is absolutely no reason why my application should be rejected and I can't believe this has happened.

There is obviously major flaws with this sunrise registration procedure and I would like to know the reasons promptly before taking it up with the press.

This is the rejection letter I received:-

Dear Network Solutions Customer,

Thank you for pre-registering your .eu domain name request with Network Solutions**.

Unfortunately, we were unable to fulfill your pre-registration request because your application failed the registry's validation process.

As stated on the Network Solutions' pre-registration site, the entire sunrise fee ($99.00 for Registered Community Trademarks) is non-refundable for .eu domain name requests that fail EURid's validation process.

I will provide more details once I receive a reply.

Gerrard Bridglal
Owner
Wotson Publishing
www.wotson.com

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Sentry Posts Blog

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters