Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

Story: America debates data retention

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Arthur B. (Thursday 20 April 2006, 11:53 PM)

  • Reply

Data retention laws may be the wet dream of people sitting behind a desk running their part of the world on paper but in reality it's nothing but a burden that's begging for misuse and abuse by white board criminals and won't stand in the way of professional criminals and illegal "underground" activities it's intented to stop.

The signs are all there. It looks good on paper. It gives more power to those that already have power. It's an excuse why those in power failed to produce meaningfull results so far. Positive results underlining the succes of the project can be generated at will with no real way to proof or disproof such claims. Visa versa, claims from opponents that it isn't working can be waived away because hard evidence is lacking or very limited. And it's backed up by political correct statements the average person will agree to.

In reality however various safety guards are missing. I'm not buying the 'innocents have nothing to fear' retoric because the only way to be innocent nowedays is by a judge ruling. And that's after the investigations and trials. Until then the only thing standing between beeing "uninvestigated" and beeing "under investigation" is one memo from some ill advised or fanatic burocrat who has had some crash cources before becoming the "expert". And that's excluding possible hidden or personal agenda's.
Or did governments suddenly acquire a few thousand electronic forensic veterans overnight to research all those logs and come to the right conclusions? Or are we to believe that all the extra burdens that do not come cheap must be done to make life easier for a handfull of experts that maybe handle a few hundred cases each year?
And how exactly will log tampering be prevented? It's all electronic you see. Manipulated in the right way and a log will tell whatever a real expert wants it to say. Incriminating a person could become as easy as running a query or a script. Or installing a tailormade backdoor. Or high-jacking his/her cell phone. Not to mention the possibilities of finding out some of the more juicy details about someone's behavioural private life and using that to your own advantage. What's next? Retrain all IT administrators to become police agents working for the goverment? Or upload in real-time every log event everywhere to some centralized government data center? Or maybe take a deep breath, take a step back and rethink this data retention thing over?

  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Sentry Posts Blog

homer

lets show everyone that labour has compasion[whilst there counting the votes] running upto march/april 2010...http://tinyurl.co...nus very good nb gordon brown said today on our... More

Post a comment

This Crap Site

How utterly stupid - I am ranked #40 in the top 100 - as a member of this site..... I mean HOW utterly stupid.... I have done sweet FA, I have only rejoined this site after a 3 or... More

Post a comment

Microsoft Security Update: November Pa...

Apologies for this late update to our core Patch Tuesday update. Here is a summary of the update .... The November Patch Tuesday update from Microsoft follows the largest patch and... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters