Desktop platforms Toolkit
Story: Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
I agree with the statement that you have to choose according to what provides you value. However I strongly disagree that Open Source is inferior due to the fact that Open Source does not follow a commercial model. Did the fact that windows is a commercial product stop it from being ravaged by the code red & and nimda worms to name a couple. Does the commercial model stop Microsoft releasing service packs which break applications and then need hot fixes for the service packs. Is that reliability and dependability. Don't get me started on Microsoft Office and Internet explorer.
The Internet is a prime example to show the stupidity of these comments regarding OSS. The Internet has it's roots in community software and collaboration. In fact I would go as far as to say that 80% of the Internet is based on community software. Although the Internet is made up of community based software, it does allow the creation and delivery of commercially based services and products (amazon.com). Microsoft... You need to be solution focused and not product focused. Once you start selling solutions and benefits instead of products, I don't think that statements like these will be made.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'
-
I switched to OSS a couple of years ago, and apart... David Wright -
It sounds like a simple case of talking down... Richard -
What do they use in the Super Computer e... RSE -
I agree with the statement that you have to choose... Jason Simmons -
DNS, SMTP, SNMP, TCP/IP, etc, etc.
All Open Source... Arthur B. -
More M$ misspeak, and the only ones who will belie... Oldator -
Well M$ can say what they want. Let the facts spea... midi-man -
Yep would agree with the above comments, of c... George Orwell
Back to: Microsoft: Open source 'not reliable or dependable'









