Desktop platforms Toolkit
Story: Criticism mounts over Birmingham's Linux project
Read the Report
The project was not a failure due to the OS distribution choice or because the choosen distribution did'nt work I've been told it was simply due to the business (Libraries) not wanting to implement a solution which they saw as a too big change for them, and more work, training for their library staff. The trial dogstar is on about was not the pilot but an initial trail run by libraries to see what the public prefered as the look and feel for the desktop. But Ubuntu (who clearly dogstar is an advocate of) was not chosen as the maturity of the distribution and official support was not proven.
I suggesst people read the report that was published for the Opwn Source Academy before making up their minds and placing blame.
http://opensourceacademy.gov.uk/solutions/casestudies/birminham-city-council
Full Talkback thread
Story: Criticism mounts over Birmingham's Linux project
-
Issues that have not been explored dogStar -
Lame excuses JNeuhoff -
Facts: Successful Pilot TestU -
Fact: Successful pilot, disasterous rollout dogStar -
Read the Report TestU -
Distro choice Sothis -
Facts: Successful Pilot TestU -
Tax Payers Pay Again 1000215420 -
Open source debate brought to a close - for now TestU -
Open source debate brought to a close - for n... TestU -
Open Source debate barely started Sothis









