Security management Toolkit
Story: Digital rights group slams e-voting
Remote e-voting
One of the arguments oft used against remote e-voting is that it opens up vote selling and coercion (taken from the ORG briefing pack : "Elections held using remote voting can be contentious because it is difficult to verify that the voter is who they claim to be. Both anonymity and privacy are compromised because others can watch the elector vote. This opens the door to voter coercion and vote buying.", available from http://www.openrightsgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/org-evoting-briefing-pack-final.pdf)
Yet in this article we see postal voting being advocated by one of the contributors to this document! Can someone please explain to me how postal votes are free from these problems?
Full Talkback thread
Story: Digital rights group slams e-voting
-
On ballot secrecy PSVDavey -
Do Both Andrew Meredith -
Pros and cons PSVDavey -
Re: Pros and Cons Andrew Meredith -
Ballot tracability null-loop
-
Remote e-voting null-loop -
A good point David Meyer
-
Remote e-voting null-loop
-
Yes, but... David Meyer
-
Clarification null-loop
-
No worries! David Meyer
-
A matter of scale PSVDavey
-
Coersion vs. Corruption Andrew Meredith
Back to: Digital rights group slams e-voting
