Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Story: Researcher: Operating systems inherently flawed

  • Previous comment

Posted by: 1000044325 (Thursday 20 September 2007, 6:13 AM)

  • Reply

Yes - they are - but they need not have been

The driver problem was known almost 30 years ago and became a major concern in the design of Intel's 286 chip. It was recognised that device and allied drivers would enter an OS from any source, a source beyond the control of that OS designer or distributor and well beyond the comprehension of an inexpert end-user. Thus separation via "protection rings" (4 in the case of the Intel 286 and even today's Pentium), instruction limitation, memory segmentation and memory capability hardware were all introduced based around the "Multics" experience. A sheer lack of interest by governments and regulatory authorities led to a "laisez-faire" attitude towards the ICT industry and no imperatives for "designed-in" security ever materialised - and still do not. The commodity OS of today is simply the "weakest link" and by today we should have had modernised version of "mandatory access control" in place suitable for home/small business and enterprise systems. ("B2 by '95"?) Joanna is 100% right. Increased sophistication in attacks are rendering the commodity OS completely vulnerable to any form of malware, from spyware to rootkits to..... The answer - well, SELinux was a start (thanks to the USA's NSA) but even it does not support the true security hardware implicit in Intels' original design. The "mess" that is the Intel "TXT" (trusted execution technology) or "LaGrande", along the lines of Microsoft's "Palladium" scheme, is providing a ridiculous patch up to hardware that should not be necessary. Yes - a new protection ring - "ring -0" plus some protected memory access. Imagine what could have been - trusted XENIX, GEMSOS technologies all made available to the connected global Internet user.
As the House of Lords has intimated - the only way anything will happen to change the situation is most likely by legislation over the ICT industry - but - hold on - wasn't that also needed for the car, air transport, pharmaceutical and numerous industries.
It really is time to STOP BLAMING THE END-USER for security problems that have been built into commodity operating systems. Governments need to BLAME THE ICT INDUSTRY itself.

Private message disabled

1000044325

1000044325
n/a
Member since: August 2004

Site Activity Rating:

1

 


  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread


Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters