Enterprise applications Toolkit
Story: Microsoft: IBM masterminded OOXML failure
Business As Usual according to St. M$
"If it was not for IBM, it would have been business as usual for this standard."
What an amazing statement! Fast Track. Compromised ISO. Promises to be broken. Proprietry Content. Hidden Information. Unspecified Dependencies. Poorly Documented. Stuffed Ballots, etc., etc. Need I go on? Oh Yes. Only for MS Office 2007.
"Business as usual" Microsoft lock-in. Past, present and future. No interest in the greater good such as an open and durable Standard that can be universely and safely adopted. And anyway M$ document format will be changed every few years.
Moley
Retired, UK
Member since: January 2004
Site Activity Rating:
This member is ranked #15 in our top 100
Full Talkback thread
Story: Microsoft: IBM masterminded OOXML failure
-
you are sort of right skunkymonkey -
Really - what do you think of the real story... slimnicky
-
Actually its an IBM Witch Hunt and you should... slimnicky
-
Is OOXML actually open? Wolfie78
-
Want a little cheese with that WHINE? J.A. Watson
-
If it was not for IBM ator1940
-
Business As Usual according to St. M$ Moley -
A standard for every man, woman, and child superm401
-
Microsoft WitchHunt evilmind
-
Microsoft's OXML policy positions Nicos Tsilas
-
Conflict of interest? harpless
-
all you need to read on OOXML RayRoko
-
Get the facts? You sound awfully like M... antiFUD -
Here is Google's REAL view, straight fro... Chris Rankin
-
Speaking of witch hunts... Goldie Simmons
-
Groklaw, refuted Burton.... slimnicky
-
That Burton Group report David Meyer
-
There are more issues than jus... antiFUD
-
So you're all angry and m... ego.sum.stig
