Office applications Toolkit
Story: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
Google motivation
I was stating the motivation for Google to be against the format. They are using a competing format that is less feature rich. That is why Google is against OOXML becoming an ISO standard, because then Google will have to compete more against office software that has features Google apps cannot provide (at least for a while).
You suggest that google cannot use OOXML but the specs are publicly availiable for more than a year now and google. Also google is able to interprete the old binary office formats of which the specification are a lot less good than OOXML spec.
The ODF format Google is using cannot supply the needs for a faithfull representation of most current document so when converting to ODF you will loose information. The OOXML format does allow faithfull represnetaion of the data in current MS Office files after conversion. This is very important for many of the current Office users which have billions of existing Office documents. Also the OOXML format is a lot more feature rich than ODF and can support the features currently used in MS Office. To support the features in MS Office in a simpler format like ODF it would require extensive MS extensions to ODF which would cripple ODF for any other users. Even now it is difficult for the different ODF implementation to interprete OpenOffice propriety features in ODF. This would become a lot more difficult if ODF documents were to consist more of propriety extensions than official standard complient code.
Btw, referring to the consortium info is like referring to the Linux foundation as Andy writing that blog is a director of the Linux foudation and a laywer working with IBM in an anti-ooxml crusade. He is also aprticipating in the anti-ooxml meeting in Geneva at the moment sitting in a panel with IBM VP Bob Sutor.
So the consortiuminfo blog, I read as an IBM blog (of course it very visibly often directly referring to the blogs of IBM employees like Bob Sutor)
Full Talkback thread
Story: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
-
Very nice Albert lars -
Microsoft double-tongued Anonymous123 -
ODF useless for Microsoft needs Albert -
OOXML is fully open Albert -
Sorry, the comment was cut short. Here'... garyedwards -
Reasons for lack of interoperbility in ODF Albert -
ODF, The Big Picture Goldie Simmons -
Breaking the Web garyedwards -
Google has invested in competing format Albert -
Document standards 2000355890 -
Questioning Google’s objectiveness harpless -
Microsoft's Argument is Ridiculous Goldie Simmons -
insufficient and unnecessary standard, designed pu... ator1940 -
Interoperability and the binary ODF conversion di... garyedwards -
A bit of background... Anonymous123 -
Microsoft moves forward with OOXML SDK Karen Friar
-
The rest of the text in the previous tal... lars -
Google motivation Albert -
Which OOXML features in particular can't... Chris Rankin -
XML in spirit isn't going to be as effic... Anonymous123 -
But does even Microsoft Office use OOXML... Chris Rankin -
Thanks Gary, very informative Goldie Simmons -
Durusau's proposal is preposterous Marbux -
A very Interesting Take Moley -
Features not in ODF Albert -
OOXML performance explained Albert -
Office and OOXML David Meyer
-
MS Office 2007 does fully support O... Albert -
ISO Credibility garyedwards -
Thank you for an intelligent r... Anonymous123 -
Of course ODF isn't backwards... Chris Rankin -
Then why add "read"... Chris Rankin -
00o writes compliant files Goldie Simmons -
You are contradicting Rupert G... Chris Rankin -
Terse markup for speed -- NOT Marbux -
Tail end of previous comment garyedwards -
Cut to the chase garyedwards -
ODF also has backwards compati... Albert -
MS influencing ODF development... Albert -
No, OOo is not fully complient... Albert -
MS Office 2007 files fully val... Albert -
That's OK, I contradict R... Rupert Goodwins
-
Widespread support for OOXML a... Albert -
Actually OOXML is not really t... Albert -
Actually MS Office 2007 compli... Albert -
Actually, you're making all th... Chris Rankin -
It's a question of greate... Chris Rankin -
Questions for the community Goldie Simmons -
Do tell me more, Albert Marbux -
Albert, give me a single examp... Marbux -
Open Standards Moley -
If you plan for incompatiblity... Albert -
Believe is in the prove Albert -
ODF and OOXML are standards in... Marbux -
explaination Albert -
ODF better readable but less g... Albert -
Interoperability Albert -
OOXML is Open Albert -
Then why does the same spreads... Marbux -
Extensions are bugs, not featu... Marbux -
OOXML interop is abysmal Marbux -
Extensions to ODF realistic ? Albert -
Undocumented eXtensions and St... garyedwards -
Not 1,500 extensions Marbux -
You've got to be kidding,... Marbux









