Office applications Toolkit
Story: ISO calls for end to OOXML 'personal attacks'
Personal Attacks?
Not that I have noticed any personal attacks, the whole process has thoroughly rejected constructive technical input from competent sources. Consequently what else could critics do but raise a lot of objection to the completely flawed process.
ISO requires to mend fences now, not defend an untenable position by raising a false complaint. There have been no personal attacks as such.
Moley
Retired, UK
Member since: January 2004
Site Activity Rating:
This member is ranked #15 in our top 100
Full Talkback thread
Story: ISO calls for end to OOXML 'personal attacks'
-
If they weren't thugs, we wouldn't hate them J.A. Watson -
Well said LadyRoot David Long
-
Lady Root, I sincerely hope you're just troll... Chris Rankin
-
Real Standards Tezzer
-
ISO lost all credibility samie91
-
You missed the real story with the meeting in Oslo Marbux
-
If there's such strong disagreement, OOXML shouldn... SPM
-
ISO process has been gamed, why back off? rkhalloran
-
If there was ever a place for non-violent protest.... ijames
-
Personal attacks? ego.sum.stig
-
Personal Attacks? Moley -
Oh, hating Microsoft is so cool... LadyRoot
-
O(O)XML and .docx Moley
-
Microsoft has right to dictate standards... LadyRoot -
Apple and Google are "tech darlings" for... ijames
-
OOXML personal attacks. ator1940
-
Eyes have been opened David Long
-
CoolAid required dogStar
-
Mostly right, with critical excepti... J.A. Watson
-
But OOXML is a non-standard SPM
-
Microsoft should not dictate standa... rkhalloran
-
Talk about missing the point so com... ego.sum.stig
-
ODF is not a standard LadyRoot
-
The ISO would disagree dogStar
-
ODF is ISO/IEC 26300:2006 Chris Rankin
-
de-facto vs. de-jure rkhalloran
-
(Full ISO link provided here.) Chris Rankin
-
Yes! Microsoft must be stoppe... ijames
