Enterprise applications Toolkit
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
Is this a 'Chewbacca defence' or something?
Um, this 'OOXML expert' is the chair of the BSI committee that reversed the BSI's decision, isn't he?
I don't suppose this has anything to do with the action against the BSI in the High Court:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39408917,00.htm
Whether it does, or is just yet another strange 'coincidence', surely he was aware of the flaws in his 'smoke test' as pointed out in Peter Judge's comment?
* FOOTNOTE *
Explanation of 'Chewbacca Defence':
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_Defense
Full Talkback thread
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
-
OpenOffice defence: Brown is using the wrong versi... PeterJudge -
IBM expert - Brown got it wrong PeterJudge -
Point 3 wrong Albert -
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we... Albert
-
It is quite simple RCWeir -
Doesn't Brown's "no... Marbux
-
Micrsoft committed to ISO vers... Albert
-
ODF 1.1 is indeed an internati... RCWeir
-
Bottom line: no featureful imp... Marbux
-
Strange inconsistency Rob Albert
-
Evolution not revolution 1000013186
-
Evolution indeed Albert
-
My main objections to OOXML ar... 1000013186
-
Not inconsistent at all RCWeir
-
Obfuscation 1000013186
-
Is this a 'Chewbacca defence' or something? Sothis -
How odd... ego.sum.stig
-
'Smoke test' or 'Smoke screen'? kurizocan2
Back to: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
