Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we know ISO is not supported
If OpenOffice people state that the version used by the Alex Brwon is the wrong version and he used the ISO/IEC 26300 version then obviously OpenOffice is not producing valid ISO/IEC standard files.
It is strange people now critisise the same principle as was apllied to the OOXML specification a week ago and when FOSS bloggers spread this everywhere as MS Office OOXML not being ISO/IEC compliant.
Obviously OpenOffice is also not ISO ODF compliant but at least for OOXML the standardization by ISO is still not completed and the ISO standardization of ISO ODF has been finished almost 2 years ago
Full Talkback thread
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
-
OpenOffice defence: Brown is using the wrong versi... PeterJudge 
-
IBM expert - Brown got it wrong PeterJudge -
Point 3 wrong Albert -
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we... Albert -
It is quite simple RCWeir -
Doesn't Brown's "no... Marbux
-
Micrsoft committed to ISO vers... Albert
-
ODF 1.1 is indeed an internati... RCWeir
-
Bottom line: no featureful imp... Marbux
-
Strange inconsistency Rob Albert
-
Evolution not revolution 1000013186
-
Evolution indeed Albert
-
My main objections to OOXML ar... 1000013186
-
Not inconsistent at all RCWeir
-
Obfuscation 1000013186
-
Is this a 'Chewbacca defence' or somethi... Sothis
-
How odd... ego.sum.stig
-
'Smoke test' or 'Smoke screen'? kurizocan2
Back to: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
