Enterprise applications Toolkit
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
ODF 1.1 is indeed an international standard
An "international standard" is defined, in ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004, definition 3.2.1.1, as "[A] standard that is adopted by an international standardizing/standards organization and made available to the public."
All OASIS Standards (or for that matter Ecma Standards) are international standards by this definition.
I guess the question to ask, is what incremental value would you ascribe to rubber stamping by JTC1? Was the approval of OOXML an indication of quality that is worth the effort attaining? I have my doubts. As it stands today, the title "OASIS Standard" is a far greater indication of quality than "ISO/IEC Standard". SC34 wishes that they could be as open, as transparent and as innovative as OASIS is.
Full Talkback thread
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
-
OpenOffice defence: Brown is using the wrong versi... PeterJudge -
IBM expert - Brown got it wrong PeterJudge -
Point 3 wrong Albert -
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we... Albert
-
It is quite simple RCWeir -
Doesn't Brown's "no... Marbux
-
Micrsoft committed to ISO vers... Albert
-
ODF 1.1 is indeed an internati... RCWeir -
Bottom line: no featureful imp... Marbux
-
Strange inconsistency Rob Albert
-
Evolution not revolution 1000013186
-
Evolution indeed Albert
-
My main objections to OOXML ar... 1000013186
-
Not inconsistent at all RCWeir
-
Obfuscation 1000013186
-
Is this a 'Chewbacca defence' or something? Sothis
-
How odd... ego.sum.stig
-
'Smoke test' or 'Smoke screen'? kurizocan2
Back to: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
