Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
Not inconsistent at all
My objection to Relax NG DTD Compatibility, is not that it is an OASIS Committee Specifcation rather than an ISO Standard. My objection to apply that specification is that ODF 1.0 does not claim to conform to the part of that standard that was applied to Alex.
You can't just take a random standard and apply its constraints to ODF and say that ODF is broken because it does not conform to that other standard. For example, ODF 1.0 does not conform to XML 1.1, VRML, SGML, OpenFont, OOXML, or PDF/A. But we never said that we did.
ODF is defined by what the text of ODF standard states. It is that simple.
RCWeir
Westford, MA
Member since: May 2008
Site Activity Rating:
This member is ranked #64 in our top 100
Full Talkback thread
Story: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
-
OpenOffice defence: Brown is using the wrong versi... PeterJudge 
-
IBM expert - Brown got it wrong PeterJudge -
Point 3 wrong Albert -
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we... Albert
-
It is quite simple RCWeir -
Doesn't Brown's "no... Marbux
-
Micrsoft committed to ISO vers... Albert
-
ODF 1.1 is indeed an internati... RCWeir
-
Bottom line: no featureful imp... Marbux
-
Strange inconsistency Rob Albert
-
Evolution not revolution 1000013186
-
Evolution indeed Albert
-
My main objections to OOXML ar... 1000013186
-
Not inconsistent at all RCWeir -
Obfuscation 1000013186
-
Is this a 'Chewbacca defence' or somethi... Sothis
-
How odd... ego.sum.stig
-
'Smoke test' or 'Smoke screen'? kurizocan2
Back to: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
