Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: ISO offers to take on ODF maintenance
Sauce for the goose
"Sauce for the goose isn't sauce for the gander, at least at IBM."
The same can be said for ISO, as the "sauce" used at ISO for ratifying ODF was the PAS ("Publicly Available Standards") path, while OOXML used the Fast Track path.
And indeed, PAS and Fast Track provisions for maintenance of the resulting standard are not the same...
"Brown noted [...] it turns out the rubber-stamp accusation is more justly levelled at ODF."
In the case of ODF, it is not an accusation, it is a fact: the purpose of the PAS procedure is precisely to rubber-stamp Publicly Available Standards already reviewed by another standard body, without extensively rewriting them, as it was needed for OOXML.
Full Talkback thread
Story: ISO offers to take on ODF maintenance
-
ISO or Microsoft ? Luc Bollen -
Sauce for the goose Luc Bollen -
So ODF actually SHOULD be rubber stamped? PeterJudge -
The point is that OOXML should not have... Luc Bollen -
In which case, one possible solutio... Chris Rankin -
Loss of Credibility J.A. Watson -
Total Failure Tezzer -
I'm sorry but does ISO have any relevance any... Yellowcave




