Advertisement
Promo

Enterprise open source Toolkit

Story: What vendors really mean by 'open source'

  • Previous comment

Posted by: pjc158 (Saturday 20 December 2008, 2:35 PM)

  • Reply

The big con - open source

Open source is just a step up from shareware which really never took off.

The computer industry like other industries likes to keep re-inventing itself to keep the sales cycle going. For example we are now talking about Web 2.0 and even before that gets going it will be then Web 3.0.

The poor old customer just cannot keep up never mind running their own businesses. Over the years I have seen many companies waste millions of dollars investing in the latest technology only to see it either fail or not offer any real benefits over the systems they replaced.

Now you have companies jumping on the back of ‘Open Source’ saying how wonderful it is and cost effective it can be compared to their proprietary systems. Mark Taylor says that open source removes the 'Lock' down that exists in proprietary systems. What he is not actually telling you that there is really no 'Lock' down; it is just the cost and effort to move to a new system. It would be exactly the same for a company that has been using an 'Open Source' solution for a number of years and wants to move to the greatest and latest system being sold to them.

Of course I see why Mark Taylor likes to bang the open source drum, his company is not about producing anything, but providing services on the back of other people’s efforts. I have no qualms about that, everybody is entitled to make money, except 'Proprietary' software companies.

The 'Big Con', open source is being marketed by ‘Open Source’ companies that it is better quality then proprietary software. Strange it is the same people that have been developing the proprietary software that is now developing the open source software. There are thousands of open source projects that should have never been started, the quality and fit for purpose is non-existent. Of course there are always the success stories for open source projects like Linux, GNU tools, Boost, Postges and applications such as SugarCRM.

The only companies making money out of open source (and there are many that are not) are service companies. The problem is the open source market can support so many service based companies. So if open source software is to be successful it needs money to pay for continued development and support just like proprietary software or companies using it will find them selves in the same position when developers realise that they cannot keep working for free and the open source company disappears.

As my father kept telling me as I grew up I need to get out there and get a paid job as there is no free lunch. Sooner or later open source software companies will have to do the same one way or another.

Private message disabled

pjc158

pjc158
n/a
Member since: March 2007

Site Activity Rating:

1

 


  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Story: What vendors really mean by 'open source'

  1. The big con - open source pjc158
  2. I think you misunderstand what vendors actual... ecentric
  3. A play on words pjc158
  4. Incorrect opnsrcguy
  5. Typical response embrace or di... pjc158
  6. I think you miss the point dogStar
  7. FYI pjc158
  8. The Ratchet Effect Andrew Meredith
  9. You assume too much... pjc158
  10. Re: You assume too much... Andrew Meredith
  11. As Victor Meldrew would say... pjc158
  12. Nope .. don't see it Andrew Meredith
  13. Perhaps that is... pjc158
  14. Pot Kettle Andrew Meredith
  15. Open source software offers re... conz
  16. You make ... pjc158
  17. There never is Andrew Meredith
  18. pjc158, you don't understand open source troub
  19. Please, please, please ZDNet ... dogStar
  20. Actually Andrew Meredith
  21. Re: The big con - open source Andrew Meredith
  22. Not surprised by your response pjc158
  23. Re: Yahh Booh Sucks Andrew Meredith
  24. Once again I argue show me the... pjc158
  25. Re: open source and support conz
  26. Of course you will... pjc158
  27. Open source a better long-term... conz
  28. Only if they... pjc158
  29. Ah, the Trolls have landed. Chris Rankin
  30. Interesting... pjc158
  31. Trying to justify monopolism dogStar
  32. You think monopoly can only... pjc158
  33. Re: You think monopoly can onl... Andrew Meredith
  34. Get your facts right... pjc158
  35. No open source company can bec... conz
  36. Your response shows... pjc158
  37. The GPL keeps the bastards hon... conz
  38. Re: Get your facts right... Andrew Meredith
  39. Oh dear... pjc158
  40. Re: Oh dear... Andrew Meredith
  41. Seems I have... pjc158
  42. Re: Seems I have... Andrew Meredith

Back to: What vendors really mean by 'open source'

Video icon

Video

Discussions

siarad siarad

Nice idea

Tuesday 1 December 2009, 10:54 AM

1 comment
siarad siarad

Worried WiFi user

Tuesday 1 December 2009, 10:28 AM

6 comments
hkommedal hkommedal

What else DO you expect. . .

Tuesday 1 December 2009, 8:52 AM

5 comments
hkommedal hkommedal

Hang on a moment.

Tuesday 1 December 2009, 8:29 AM

2 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters