Enterprise open source Toolkit
Story: What vendors really mean by 'open source'
Incorrect
As someone who has been in open source for a number of years, I can tell you that you are very shortsighted on this one.
Open source, as indicated in the name, allows for open source code to the community. No play on words there. This source code is in its pre-compiled state. This means it is up to the community to do with it what it may. The company that represents the source code can provide the compiled version for free, for a charge, as part of a packaged service, and much more. This is why there are so many OSS licenses. Many open source companies offer support & consulting with these products, but in order for a company to stay afloat for a long time, they need to make money outside of consulting as this isn't a long-term revenue strategy.
Shareware is normally associated with tools, not products. There is a big difference here. Zip, was a shareware product for a long time, and it truthfully only has a single small function. New and better ways of compressing occurred, and now, it is a commercial tool at a very low price.
You see, open source is a business and distribution strategy. It provides methods for the ways a product is packaged, distributed, marketed, and even helps associate what type of price point at which you compete.
Each good open source company has 10s - 100s of partners in the product and services spaces, plus many more who use the technology without a formalized relationship. There are plenty of small organizations that make complete livings by implementing open source solutions. I am not sure how you talk about job loss here.
As a matter of fact, I have worked for a couple of companies in this space where companies left IBM, Oracle, etc. for open source companies and saved into the millions allowing employment to continue for many of its employees. Your assumptions are either incorrect or you are completely misinformed. Perhaps you either just purchased a large commercial offering or you represent one. No matter the case, open source is stronger than ever thanks to the current market, so you had better either embrace it or move out of the way.
Full Talkback thread
Story: What vendors really mean by 'open source'
-
The big con - open source pjc158 -
I think you misunderstand what vendors actual... ecentric -
A play on words pjc158 -
Incorrect opnsrcguy -
Typical response embrace or di... pjc158 -
I think you miss the point dogStar -
FYI pjc158 -
The Ratchet Effect Andrew Meredith -
You assume too much... pjc158 -
Re: You assume too much... Andrew Meredith -
As Victor Meldrew would say... pjc158 -
Nope .. don't see it Andrew Meredith -
Perhaps that is... pjc158 -
Pot Kettle Andrew Meredith -
Open source software offers re... conz -
You make ... pjc158 -
There never is Andrew Meredith -
pjc158, you don't understand open source troub -
Please, please, please ZDNet ... dogStar -
Actually Andrew Meredith -
Re: The big con - open source Andrew Meredith -
Not surprised by your response pjc158 -
Re: Yahh Booh Sucks Andrew Meredith -
Once again I argue show me the... pjc158 -
Re: open source and support conz -
Of course you will... pjc158 -
Open source a better long-term... conz -
Only if they... pjc158 -
Ah, the Trolls have landed. Chris Rankin -
Interesting... pjc158 -
Trying to justify monopolism dogStar -
You think monopoly can only... pjc158 -
Re: You think monopoly can onl... Andrew Meredith -
Get your facts right... pjc158 -
No open source company can bec... conz -
Your response shows... pjc158 -
The GPL keeps the bastards hon... conz -
Re: Get your facts right... Andrew Meredith -
Oh dear... pjc158 -
Re: Oh dear... Andrew Meredith -
Seems I have... pjc158 -
Re: Seems I have... Andrew Meredith




