Processors Toolkit
Story: Netbook platforms: VIA Nano v. Intel Atom
Certainly Not Incompetent
As far as I am concerned, in order to be interesting and useful these tests have to give some indication of "real world" performance, and there is no better way of doing that than to include equivalent tests on a known reference processor. I don't care how much faster of slower the Atom and VIA are compared to each other, if I don't know how they are going to compare to something I already know. Thus, including the desktop processor in the tests was an excellent idea.
As for testing the Atom over-clocked, why on earth would they want to do that? First, how many netbook buyers are going to know how to over-clock a CPU, or even know that it can be done? Second, what is the "expected use" of a netbook - is it likely to be used for something that is so CPU intensive that over-clocking will be worthwhile? Third, and perhaps most importantly, in my experience one of the largest problems with netbooks is the amount of heat that they generate, so why on earth would one want to over-clock the CPU and thus produce even more heat?
jw 11/2/2009
J.A. Watson
Applications Development, Subingen, Solothurn, Bern, Switzerland
Member since: November 2007
Site Activity Rating:
This member is ranked #2 in our top 100
Full Talkback thread
Story: Netbook platforms: VIA Nano v. Intel Atom
-
This review is incompetent GeorgeOu -
For reference... Charles McLellan
-
The incompetence is that you used 1.8 Na... GeorgeOu -
Certainly Not Incompetent J.A. Watson -
The realworld performance is 1.3 GHz for... GeorgeOu -
The article is clear about what it&... Rupert Goodwins
-
The article CLAIMS it is testi... GeorgeOu -
Look up the MSI Wind, it officially oper... GeorgeOu -
MSI Wind? Uses 1,9 GHz processor? lyovushka -
Official Capable darkjeric -
It's a turbo button GeorgeOu -
More details needed Gerilart -
Wrong comparison darkjeric -
Bananas, Apples and Oranges Xwindowsjunkie -
Biased or inept, you be the judge tcsenter







