Processors Toolkit
Story: Netbook platforms: VIA Nano v. Intel Atom
The incompetence is that you used 1.8 Nano results to represent a Netbook
The incompetence is that you used 1.8 Via Nano results to represent a Netbook. That represents a 38.5% inflation in the Via results for a Via Nano Netbook which operates at 1.3 GHz and most people don't understand the difference so they're mislead by this article.
Furthermore, you didn't even run an adequate suite of multi-threaded benchmarks nor did you test Atom at 1.9 GHz which is a valid clock speed for some atom based Netbooks.
Full Talkback thread
Story: Netbook platforms: VIA Nano v. Intel Atom
-
This review is incompetent GeorgeOu -
For reference... Charles McLellan 
-
The incompetence is that you used 1.8 Na... GeorgeOu -
Certainly Not Incompetent J.A. Watson
-
The realworld performance is 1.3 GHz for... GeorgeOu -
The article is clear about what it&... Rupert Goodwins
-
The article CLAIMS it is testi... GeorgeOu
-
Look up the MSI Wind, it officially oper... GeorgeOu
-
MSI Wind? Uses 1,9 GHz processor? lyovushka
-
Official Capable darkjeric
-
It's a turbo button GeorgeOu
-
More details needed Gerilart
-
Wrong comparison darkjeric
-
Bananas, Apples and Oranges Xwindowsjunkie
-
Biased or inept, you be the judge tcsenter
