Advertisement
Promo

Enterprise applications Toolkit

Story: Microsoft, Linux Foundation unite against proposal

  • Previous comment

Posted by: Andrew Meredith (Tuesday 19 May 2009, 3:25 PM)

  • Reply

Paid for only

I agree with the Linux Foundation's stance as things currently stand. However, if the law was that the purchaser of a packaged software product had legal recourse against the organisation publishing the software, that might at least go some way to redressing the balance between between paid for a free software. As it stands you have the same rights buying the software as you do downloading free software, in fact, some would argue less. So what is the consumer buying?

If some of these arrogant corporates who sell sub standard products and then just shrug when people complain had to back their marketing gloss up, maybe they would try a little harder to release decent stuff.

Also, this way, the developers would not be affected and open source would be completely immune, except, again, where the software is sold as package and then the onus is on the organisation selling the software to properly test the variant they are releasing.

Andrew Meredith

Andrew Meredith
IT Consultant, Chippenham, Wiltshire
Member since: January 2004

Site Activity Rating:

3

 


  • Previous comment

  • Reply to this comment
  • Return to story
  • Report this as offensive


Full Talkback thread

Video icon

Video


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters