Security threats Toolkit

Story: Tories champion Nasa hacker in parliament

Posted by: truthseeker (Friday 7 August 2009, 8:52 AM)

Gary McKinnon has Always Denied the Alleged Damage

Gary McKinnon adnitted computer misuse but has always denied the alleged damage and very recent disclosure in court by the Crown Prosecution Service shows that the U.S have no evidence whatsoever of the alleged damage.
Submsissions by the U.S are marked by the CPS lawyer as "No Evidence" and Hearsay.
So you are wrong. Gary McKinnon has never admitted to damage and in March 2002 when the crime was committed, without damage it was not an extraditable nor a Federal offence.

This is why the U.S cynically waited until June 2005 until the U.K started using the one sided treaty and the U.S was now no longer required to provide any evidence in order to extradite any U.K citizen.
If we want to extradite an American, we have to provide evidence.

This treaty was to be used for terrorists, so where are the terrorists? Can't the U.S find any?
The U.S is currently trying to extradite Ian Norris for price fixing. Norris is a 66 year old man with cancer and despite the House of Lords clearing Norris of price fixing as it was not a crime in the U.K at that time, the U.S are still trying to extradite him for a related offence of the crime that never was.

The U.S are trying to extradite British Airways Execs.

So Where are the Terrorists.

View complete profile

Private message disabled

View all posts