Apple refreshes Mac OSX
News Apple Computer has issued an update to its Mac OS X operating system just three weeks after the software's debut. Apple is delivering software updates through a tool in Mac OS X. The update follows the release of Apple's latest Mac operating system...
[April 17, 2001, 8:08]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback You technical pundits can sit here and gripe about speed and usability until the cows come home, and Apple OSX sales will continue to grow. OSX is the ony viable challeger to Windows available today - for the average Joe.
[January 20, 2006, 15:30]
Apple patches OSX
News Apple has released an update to the Mac operating system that it hopes will alleviate the video problems that consumers had experienced with the first Intel-based Macs. On Tuesday, Apple released Mac OS X 10.4.5, an update to Mac OS X Tiger.
[February 16, 2006, 9:15]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback My problem is that I can only have OSX on one piece of hardware, as you said imagine a world where every piece of software works on every PC. Until that day I wont buy Apple. Good old Jober! Fair enough open source, I agree.
[November 12, 2005, 18:01]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Saying that the only reason OSX only runs on Apple hardware is to keep margins up is not entirely true. In other words, it helps with the overall user experience, which is what Apple is all about. Apple will not have the same problem.
[November 9, 2005, 22:31]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Osx has the potential to deliver only the basics that a secretary wants. BUT if Apple gave them a simple stable platform that your grandmother could use imagine the pandgim shift.market share to 50% in a year.
[March 21, 2006, 4:09]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Even if OSX was developed for a few chipsets designed to work very well, an alternative at an affordable price is needed. As true diehard Apple user's defend a great product - both the software and (off the shelf, hand-picked) hardware, let's not...
[November 10, 2005, 4:02]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback OSX is superior. And if you were said user, and DID need to pay Apple to fix it, it would cost you big bucks. But the idea that you can compare the thousands of off-brand piss-poor PC models to multi-thousand dollar Apple masterpieces is silly.
[November 11, 2005, 4:25]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback You might have discovered that just because OSX doesn't work in exactly the same way windows does, doesn't mean these options aren't there! Rotten Apple.oh dear oh dear. YOU REALLY SHOULD HAVE GIVEN IT A CHANCE!
[May 12, 2006, 12:22]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Rotten Apple, you evidently don't know much about how to use OSX. Learn how OSX works before criticizing it. If you want to move a file somewhere, hold Apple and drag it where you want it. The correct way to quit any program is to press Apple+Q.
[November 11, 2005, 22:00]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback And yes, hardware choices will be more plentiful, despite Apple's continued control over their product (isn't it ATI who's already coming out with OSX/XP enabled PCIE cards? OSX will be hacked.hrm. Apple won't be handing out drivers for just any...
[November 13, 2005, 16:58]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback They've had versions of OSX running on PC since the early days. PC upkeep may be hard if you're unwilling to format once in a while to regather all your resources (I do the same with OSX - any OS gets cluttered if you're not anal about organization...
[November 10, 2005, 20:19]
Apple Mac OS X Tiger: a first look
Talkback What do you guys expect from a site that touts Windows XP Pro *OVER* OSX 10.3 (in the computer reviews)? I mean really, all hardware aside, OSX is by far the better OS. Unix does things that Windows only dreams of doing.
[January 29, 2005, 17:50]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback OSX will Rock on supported hardware, and doe not give the headaches that Windows does. I've installed load of MAC software and it has acceptable performance knowing Rosseta being emulated with SSE2 on my PC.
[November 11, 2005, 17:33]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Even though OSX will be cracked right after its public release, it still isn't worth the risk running it on those PCs in the jungle. I stopped comparing price between Mac and PC long ago. It isn't that I don't care about money, in fact, because I...
[November 14, 2005, 8:32]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback To the guy who "checked out OSX on his Mini".the only "application" I know that quits when you close the last window is the System Preferences window.which,you guessed it,is the one and only window it displays.
[November 14, 2005, 21:07]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback I personnally installed the crack version then upgraded it for testing OSX platform . And I want to be the first to buy it even it's costly . It's very fast and easy to use . I'd like a lot the Dashboard feature and others .very impressive .
[November 10, 2005, 10:21]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback Most of the article is fluff for anyone who has ever installed OSX legally. Just lousy journalism.if you can call it that at all. It's highly illegal.don't forget that. If you wanted to write up something useful, do some real comparisons with the...
[November 10, 2005, 18:06]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback It's too bad that the software still costs more, and for those that game, OSX really isn't much of a platform =/
[November 11, 2005, 20:31]
Apple Mac OS X on x86: a first test
Talkback I'd like to point out that OSX installed on my G5 in under ten minutes. Your pirated development installation may have taken two hours but by the final release it will most likely install at the speed of OSX on a PPC machine, i.e.three to five...
[November 11, 2005, 22:14]



